To share or not to share

Being an amateur photographer gives me an enormous amount of freedom in deciding how, or if, I want to share my images. Having just read an article by professional photographer Bruce Percy entitled Should Photography Be A Private Endeavour I must confess his conclusion really hit home for me, as I have been struggling to find a level of sharing that I feel comfortable with. The conclusion he reaches is that “We do photography for no other reason, than we do it for ourselves”. This is something I know deep down ought to be reason enough, but I have doubts about my ability to enjoy my hobby if I don’t share my images.

Let’s see if I can break this down. I am old enough to have enjoyed 35mm film photography for a couple of decades before I got my first digital camera, a 2MP Fujifilm point and shoot. During the years I shot film I was usually the only person to see the results of my labour. I may have put some of the photographs into photo albums and bored my friends and family with them, but largely they just went into storage boxes and were viewed only occasionally, and in recent years not at all. I don’t remember this being an impediment or discouragement to going out and taking pictures – it was the cost of film and processing that did that – so I was capable back then at least of enjoying photography just for the sake of it.

Roll on nearly forty years later and I have multiple ways of sharing, and believe me I have tried many: blogs, Flickr, Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and now Instagram. But I have never felt more unhappy about my photography.

Why this is so is, partly, a bit of a mystery to me. Who doesn’t want to get that little buzz that comes from a ‘like’ or a ‘fave’ from friend or stranger? Is there anything wrong with that? Well perhaps there is. My motivations have changed and I feel it whenever I raise the camera to my eye and think – how will this look on Instagram? It has changed how I look at the world, and I now tend to dismiss the kind of quiet images that I secretly love to see and produce. I love black and white photography, but I know that on sharing sites I get fewer likes for most of them than I do for the colour images.

So I have decided to only use Instagram in the way that the designers first envisaged – hosting images taken with my smartphone. I’ll keep it for fun and creativity, as I actually find using the smartphone quite liberating. For my ‘serious’ photography I am going to try what Bruce Percy suggests – keeping it back for myself. I’ll do this on a private Flickr account and if I want to share a few images I’ll do it here or make them public on Flickr. I will not worry myself about sharing potentially hundreds of images I like that I have taken in the last ten years. It may not work as a way forward but I will give it a try to see if the desire to produce personal work for myself is enough to sustain my photography.

Mountain scene, with haze.
San Bernardino Mountains, 2008.


2 thoughts on “To share or not to share”

  1. This makes a lot of sense Michael. If you’re going to use Instagram, use it in the way it’s optimised for, taking pictures with a phone, and uploading them to Instagram with the same phone. This will then of course influence the images you take with the phone, as because of the size limitations, much simpler compositions with fewer elements and perhaps brighter colours will be more effective. I like the original square format Instagram began with too, I think it’s a shame they relented and allowed rectangular formats.

    Personally, I’ve tried it a few times but can’t get into it, mostly because I like to view photographs (other people’s and my own) at a larger size than a phone screen. And whilst I do use my phone to make photographs, more often I use (and much prefer) a dedicated camera. Then getting these images on to my phone, to then upload to Instagram, is just too much faffing around. So I stick with Flickr, my blog, and making a few prints along the way.

    So what would you say is your main purpose with sharing photos on Instagram now?

    1. Thanks Dan,

      I think taking photos with a phone is so different an experience to using a dedicated camera, that often I come up with photos I know I would never get with my camera because the phone frees me up to try things and not worry about ultimate quality or even realistic colours or contrast. So sharing them on Instagram is just fun.

      When I also go through the faff of uploading my digicam photos to Instagram they don’t look right sitting next to those from the phone – they look too clean and lack that ‘pop’ that suits Instagram so well. So I think I will continue to keep the two platforms for different purposes – Flickr for my camera and Instagram for my phone. It’s just a bit annoying that friends and family will only see Instagram and not the ones I’m most proud of, on Flickr!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *